Woman guilty of breaching abortion clinic buffer zone – Latest News Update

A woman at the centre of a free speech controversy involving the US government has been found guilty of breaching a “buffer zone” outside a Bournemouth abortion clinic.

Livia Tossici-Bolt was convicted at Poole Magistrates’ Court of two charges of breaching the Public Spaces Protection Order on two days in March 2023.

The 64-year-old anti-abortion campaigner held a sign saying, “Here to talk, if you want”.

Her case caught the attention of the US State Department and US vice president JD Vance.

Her case was highlighted by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labour (DRL) – a bureau within the US Department of State, which posted a statement on X saying: “We are monitoring her case. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.”

District Judge Orla Austin told the court of the defendant: “She lacks insight that her presence could have a detrimental effect on the women attending the clinic, their associates, staff and members of the public.”

She added: “I accept her beliefs were truly held beliefs. Although it’s accepted this defendant held pro-life views, it’s important to note this case is not about the rights and wrongs about abortion but about whether the defendant was in breach of the PSPO (Public Spaces Protection Order).”

Ms Tossici-Bolt, a retired medical scientist living in Bournemouth, Dorset, said previously she was “grateful to the US State Department for taking note of my case”.

She added: “Great Britain is supposed to be a free country, yet I’ve been dragged through court merely for offering consensual conversation. I’m thankful to ADF International for supporting my legal defence.

“Peaceful expression is a fundamental right – no-one should be criminalised for harmless offers to converse.”

She went on to say that “It is tragic to see that the increase of censorship in this country has made the US feel it has to remind us of our shared values and basic civil liberties”.

“I’m grateful to the US administration for prioritising the preservation and promotion of freedom of expression and for engaging in robust diplomacy to that end,” she said.

She continued: “It deeply saddens me that the UK is seen as an international embarrassment when it comes to free speech.

“My case, involving only a mere invitation to speak, is but one example of the extreme and undeniable state of censorship in Great Britain today.

“It is important that the Government actually does respect freedom of expression, as it claims to.”